《盲目的丈夫們》講述什么樣的故事？
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the original version The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel. (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to speed up the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shotscountershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
1、《盲目的丈夫們》是在哪一年上映的？
《盲目的丈夫們》是埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆于1919年拍攝上映的一部經典劇情片。此片開創了美國當代劇情片的先河，《盲目的丈夫們》上映時票房穩坐國內外前三，創下當年最佳紀錄。在當時薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming均為最佳演員，薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming以精彩演技和完美的形象，奠定在美國影視地位。薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming飾演角色多年后仍為大眾爭相模仿。埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆之前曾被人懷疑其能力，而《盲目的丈夫們》卻奠定埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆劇情片風格。《盲目的丈夫們》首映時曾獲海外劇情片和媒體廣泛好評，被認為其優秀程度，是足以與同時期（指1980年代）好萊塢（好萊塢）優秀劇情片齊名。
2、被稱為劇情片的開先河之作的《盲目的丈夫們》，是埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆最好的作品嗎?
從埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆斬獲劇情片最佳導演 我就覺得這部《盲目的丈夫們》是他最好的劇情片。雖然埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆后來還拍出來了評價特別好的劇情片，但是《盲目的丈夫們》是他劇情片的代表作品。
3、《盲目的丈夫們》為什么能成為經典之作？
提起美國劇情片，人們就肯定會說出《盲目的丈夫們》的名字。這部由埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆導演，薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming主演的《盲目的丈夫們》，在當時，真的是成為了一匹黑馬，殺出了一條血路，創造了一個奇跡。為何會這么說，我想，就連埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆導演和薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming，都沒想到這部劇情片會得到這樣好的反響。埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆先生曾說過，這是一群失意的人湊到了一起創作出來的一部作品。因為在《盲目的丈夫們》開拍之前，薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming已經有4年無戲可拍，而薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming主演的劇情片，票房始終不理想，這樣的幾個人湊在了一起，也真是緣分！所以，正是這樣的失意感和強烈的自尊心，他們在劇情片中投入的熱情，是我們難以想象的，其實《盲目的丈夫們》中的人物心理歷程和感人的劇情，何嘗不是現實中他們的真實寫照呢？所以，他們懷著一腔心有不甘的英雄氣，用他們的實力和人情成就了這部經典劇情片，也成就了他們自己！
4、如何評價《盲目的丈夫們》?
《盲目的丈夫們》口碑非常好深受廣大觀眾喜愛，《盲目的丈夫們》一經播放立刻引來無數人關注，不僅薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming演的好而且該劇情片故事情節也非常緊湊，神馬影院（www.125my.com）觀看起來特別流暢同時還能扣人心弦，即使目前《盲目的丈夫們》收視率不佳但是該片目前受歡迎程度已經蒸蒸日上。該劇情片主演薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming，她在該劇情片中的演技可圈可點，受到薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming演的好而且該劇情片迷的認可。
5、《盲目的丈夫們》劇情片的主要內容
《盲目的丈夫們》是一部劇情片劇情片，由導演：埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆執導，主演：薩姆·德·格拉斯,Francelia,Billington,埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆,Fay,Holderness,Richard,Cumming，
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the original version The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel. (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to speed up the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shotscountershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
6、《盲目的丈夫們》是埃里克·馮·施特羅海姆導演的一部經典的劇情美國片大全，該劇講述了：Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immed，想看更多的相關影視作品，請收藏我們的網站：www.125my.com
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the original version The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel. (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to speed up the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shotscountershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
猜你喜歡
